Radeon R9 M485X vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M485X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 11% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M485X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M485X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M485X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | − |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 209% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 480% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Amethyst | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 14 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |