GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Nano will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Check Price

Radeon R9 Nano Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Radeon R9 Nano
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	175 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 Nano has 75% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 Nano - with GCN 1.2.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 Nano - by 28 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 77 mm longer, than Radeon R9 Nano.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 11500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Nano.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	50−55	50−55
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	75−80	80−85
medium / 1080p	60−65	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	80−85	80−85
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
QHD / 1440p	55−60	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
low / 720p	130−140	130−140
medium / 1080p	90−95	90−95
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	230−240	230−240
QHD / 1440p	150−160	150−160
4K / 2160p	100−110	100−110
high / 768p	220−230	220−230
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	65−70	65−70
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
QHD / 1440p	40−45	40−45
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	65−70	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Far Cry 5 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	90−95	95−100
ultra / 1080p	70−75	75−80
QHD / 1440p	45−50	45−50
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	220−230	220−230
medium / 1080p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	85−90	85−90
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−35	35−40
low / 720p	130−140	140−150
medium / 1080p	90−95	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	160−170	160−170
medium / 768p	150−160	150−160
high / 1080p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	40−45	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
QHD / 1440p	24−27	24−27
4K / 2160p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	75−80	80−85
ultra / 1080p	55−60	55−60
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	85−90	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
4K / 2160p	10−12	12−14
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	190−200	190−200
medium / 768p	120−130	130−140
high / 1080p	70−75	75−80
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
4K / 2160p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
ultra / 1080p	65−70	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Radeon R9 Nano
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.2
Code name	TU116	Fiji
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 November 2019	10 September 2015
Pipelines	1280	4096
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count	6,600 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	138.0	256.0
Floating-point performance		8,192 gflops
Length	229 mm	152 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
Shared memory		-
G-SYNC support	+
VR Ready	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	7.5
G-SYNC	+
Multi Monitor	+
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
ZeroCore		+
Mantle		+
Design		reference
Bridgeless CrossFire		+
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)		295 Sol/s
Compute units		64
AppAcceleration		+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
FRTC		+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares