FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 460 mobile is 6000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 13% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
180−190
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
95−100
100−110
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Polaris
Code name
Bonaire
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 December 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
768
896
Core clock speed
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
66.08
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
2,115 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.3
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
