FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX 460 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against Radeon RX 460 mobile, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 172% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 340% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 170% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 66.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |