GeForce 840A vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 840A and Radeon RX 460 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 840A stacks up against Radeon RX 460 mobile, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 840A
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- GeForce 840A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 145% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM108 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 66.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |