GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX 460 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX 460 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 10% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
140−150
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
180−190
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
60−65
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
85−90
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
9−10
20−22
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
35−40
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14P-
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.36
66.08
Floating-point performance
752.6 gflops
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price