GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When comparing GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 172% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
180−190
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GTX
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 March 2009
8 August 2016
Pipelines
256
896
Core clock speed
576 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
66.08
Floating-point performance
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1020 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price