GRID K160Q vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 440% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 260% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 66.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |