GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 45% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 66.08 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |