Quadro 2000D vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon RX 460 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 2000D stacks up against Radeon RX 460 mobile, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 12% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF106 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 66.08 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |