Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX 460 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 172% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 66.08 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |