Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K2000D and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 7% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro K2000D is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
140−150
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
180−190
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
60−65
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
85−90
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
9−10
20−22
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 80% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
35−40
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 March 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
954 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
66.08
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
2,115 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price