Quadro K620M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K620M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K620M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 83% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
4−5
20−22
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM108
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 March 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1180 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
66.08
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
