Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,115 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |