Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 450 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are build with Polaris architecture.
Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
180−190
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Polaris
Polaris
Code name
Polaris 11
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
27 October 2016
8 August 2016
Pipelines
640
896
Core clock speed
800 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
66.08
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
127 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
