Radeon RX 460 mobile vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon RX 460 mobile will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 81% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 129% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 104% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 169% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 139% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 2,115 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |