FirePro V7900 vs Radeon RX 460

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Radeon RX 460 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon RX 460
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 101% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon RX 460 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 365 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 109 mm longer, than Radeon RX 460.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	70−75
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	120−130
QHD / 1440p	45−50	95−100
4K / 2160p	30−33	50−55
high / 768p	110−120	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	120−130
medium / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	75−80
medium / 768p	24−27	45−50
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon RX 460
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Polaris
Code name	Cayman	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2011	8 August 2016
Pipelines	1280	896
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1090 MHz
Boost Clock		1200 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	67.20
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2,150 gflops
Length	279 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Radeon RX 460

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares