Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K620M vs Radeon RX 460

    In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K620M Check Price
    Radeon RX 460 Check Price

    Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

    Quadro K620M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K620M Radeon RX 460
    Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x8
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Radeon RX 460 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Radeon RX 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 - in Desktops.
    • Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 61 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 5000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 21−24
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 12−14
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 7−8
    4K / 2160p − 5−6
    low / 720p 14−16 40−45
    medium / 1080p 5−6 24−27
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K620M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K620M Radeon RX 460
    Architecture Maxwell Polaris
    Code name GM108 Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Release date 1 March 2015 8 August 2016
    Pipelines 384 896
    Core clock speed 1029 MHz 1090 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 3,000 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
    Texture fill rate 17.98 67.20
    Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Length 170 mm
    Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 7000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 112.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 12 (12_0)
    Shader Model 5 6.4
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 2.0
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA +
    FreeSync +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 92 Mh/s 240 Mh/s
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares