Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon RX 460
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5300M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 460
Power consumption (TDP)
85 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5300M has 13% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460.
Radeon Pro 5300M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Radeon Pro 5300M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 5300M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 460.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
7−8
4K / 2160p
10−11
5−6
low / 720p
60−65
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
55−60
30−35
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
QHD / 1440p
35−40
12−14
4K / 2160p
18−20
8−9
low / 720p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
230−240
medium / 768p
220−230
200−210
ultra / 1080p
180−190
120−130
QHD / 1440p
110−120
95−100
4K / 2160p
70−75
50−55
high / 768p
210−220
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
45−50
24−27
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
QHD / 1440p
27−30
20−22
4K / 2160p
14−16
8−9
low / 720p
80−85
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
60−65
30−35
ultra / 1080p
45−50
24−27
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
QHD / 1440p
30−35
14−16
4K / 2160p
24−27
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
65−70
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
140−150
100−110
medium / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
70−75
40−45
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
QHD / 1440p
21−24
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
40−45
medium / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 460.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−11
QHD / 1440p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
40−45
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
130−140
75−80
medium / 768p
85−90
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
4K / 2160p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 460.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 460
Architecture
Navi / RDNA
Polaris
Code name
Navi 14
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
13 November 2019
8 August 2016
Pipelines
1280
896
Core clock speed
1090 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1200 MHz
Transistor count
6,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.0
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.5
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
