FirePro M4150 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Fortnite is 137% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Metro Exodus is 366% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Opal | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 155.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Tesla C2075
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000