FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon RX 480 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon RX 480 mobile.
FirePro W5100
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 17% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Bonaire | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon R7 260X
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2075
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000