FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 3400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 4% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Minecraft is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Tesla C2075
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000