GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 2988 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |