Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon RX 480 mobile and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon RX 480 mobile stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile and Tesla M10 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 2800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 26% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 39% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,963 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |