Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon RX 480 mobile and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon RX 480 mobile will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 4868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Fortnite is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,963 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Tesla C2075
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X