FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX 540
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 540 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1053% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 540.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 540.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 540 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 540 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 540 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 540. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX 540 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |