Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX 540
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX 540, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX 540.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon RX 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 540 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 66% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 540.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 540 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 540 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 540 - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 540 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Battlefield 5 is 675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 540 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX 540 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |