FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX 5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX 5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against Radeon RX 5500M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
Radeon RX 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 5500M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 782% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 5500M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 502 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 9000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX 5500M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | Tahiti | Navi 14 / R19M-E85 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 29 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1327 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 144.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M2000
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI
- Radeon RX 5500M vs Quadro M2000
- Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI