Radeon RX 5500M vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon RX 5500M and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon RX 5500M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 5500M here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 5500M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 180% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- Radeon RX 5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- Radeon RX 5500M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 5500M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 753 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 11012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 29% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX 5500M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Fortnite is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 5500M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 14 / R19M-E85 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 29 September 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1408 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1327 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 144.8 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |