FirePro M5950 vs Radeon RX 550X
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX 550X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 550X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 550X
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 550X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX 550X has 42% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 550X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 550X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 550X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon RX 550X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 550X is 375 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 550X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 550X is 5100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX 550X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Fortnite is 54% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 550X in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 550X | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Lexa |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 16 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 37.86 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,211 gflops |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |