FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 550X
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 550X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 550X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX 550X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon RX 550X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 550X.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 550X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 550X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 550X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon RX 550X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 550X is 377 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 550X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 550X is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 70% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Radeon RX 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon RX 550X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon RX 550X | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Lexa |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 16 December 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 37.86 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,211 gflops |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |