Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K2000 and Radeon RX 560 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon RX 560 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 560 mobile has 7% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 560 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 221 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
140−150
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
55−60
110−120
QHD / 1440p
30−35
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
85−90
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Dota 2 is 61% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Fortnite is 103% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
55−60
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
27−30
65−70
medium / 768p
18−20
40−45
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon RX 560 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 March 2013
5 January 2017
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
954 MHz
1175 MHz
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
58.97
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
2,462 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price