Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
In this comparison between Radeon R9 A375 and Radeon RX 560 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 A375 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Radeon RX 560 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon RX 560 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 A375 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon R9 A375 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - in Laptops.
- Radeon R9 A375 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 275 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 5996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon RX 560 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Venus | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 5 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 58.97 |
Floating-point performance | 2,462 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI