Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX 5600M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX 5600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 4800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 5600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon RX 5600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 5600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 5600M here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX 5600M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 5600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1530 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 5600M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 5600M - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 5600M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 5600M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5600M is 10400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX 5600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5600M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX 5600M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GT200B | Navi 10 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 10,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 182.2 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |