FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX 560X mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560X mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560X mobile here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 560X mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 438% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 272 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 54% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 560X mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 560X mobile | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 5 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1172 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 81.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 92.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |