FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560X mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560X mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon RX 560X mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 272 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−12
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
9−10
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Battlefield 5 is 16% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
230−240
medium / 768p
200−210
210−220
ultra / 1080p
110−120
130−140
QHD / 1440p
85−90
100−110
4K / 2160p
45−50
55−60
high / 768p
160−170
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
7−8
9−10
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Fortnite is 11% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−105
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X mobile have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon RX 560X mobile
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Polaris
Code name
Tahiti
Polaris 11
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
5 January 2017
Pipelines
1792
1024
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1172 MHz
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
81.60
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2,611 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
92.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
large
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
