FirePro V5800 vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon RX 560X mobile. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon RX 560X mobile. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Radeon RX 560X mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560X mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560X mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon RX 560X mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 13% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 482 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 237% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Battlefield 5 is 261% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Fortnite is 169% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon RX 560X mobile | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Juniper | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 5 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1172 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 92.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |