FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 560X
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX 560X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 560X.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 275 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- FirePro S9000 is 97 mm longer, than Radeon RX 560X.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |