FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 560X
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 560X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 560X.
Radeon RX 560X
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 452 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |