Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon RX 560X
When choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon RX 560X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon RX 560X.
Radeon RX 560X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 775 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Polaris 21 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon RX 560X vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K2200
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon RX 560X vs Quadro K2200
- Radeon RX 560X vs Radeon RX Vega M GL