Quadro M1000M vs Radeon RX 560X
In this comparison between Quadro M1000M and Radeon RX 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 560X has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 560X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |