Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 560X
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX 560X
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX 560X has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 137 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 2% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 April 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 81.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |