Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 560X
In this comparison between Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX 560X has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 481 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 1492 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 560X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 11 April 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |