Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX 560X
In this comparison between Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X.
- Quadro M5000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M5000M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 560X.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 213 MHz higher, than Quadro M5000M.
- Quadro M5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M5000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 1,536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs Quadro K2200
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon RX 560X vs Quadro K2200
- Radeon RX 560X vs Radeon RX Vega M GL