FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 640
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 640 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 593 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 4014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |