GRID K260Q vs Radeon RX 640
When comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon RX 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon RX 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 640 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 473 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 114% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 158% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |