GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX 640
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon RX 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Radeon RX 640.
GRID K280Q
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon RX 640 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 473 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 78% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 72% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |