Radeon RX 640 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon RX 640 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 640 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 640 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 644 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 164% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 134% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1218 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |