Radeon RX 640 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon RX 640 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 640 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 640 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 644 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 142% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 124% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 640 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 12 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 August 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1218 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |