Radeon RX 640 vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 640 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 185 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 164% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 134% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2019 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |